Friday, June 24, 2016

Review: ‘Independence Day: Resurgence’


Review: ‘Independence Day: Resurgence’ Will Make You Wish Humanity Would Just Give Up

On July 2nd, they arrive. On July 3rd, they strike. On July 4th, we fight back. On June 24th, 2016, we…wish they had won.

In the summer of 1996, Roland Emmerich’s “Independence Day” reinvented the alien invasion genre for the blockbuster era, using newfangled digital technology to make a B-movie big enough to bring the whole world together. Its reputation may be overinflated by millennials who subsist on a steady diet of their own petrified kitsch, but Emmerich’s war of the worlds has nevertheless come to represent a type of full-bodied studio spectacle for which we all ought to be nostalgic. In fact, the self-described “master of disaster” seems really pissed at the people who aren’t. His lazy insult of a sequel — threatened since the day the first movie first cast its long shadow over America’s multiplexes — is ultimately nothing more than a giant middle finger to a generation of ungrateful moviegoers who didn’t appreciate how good they had it: “If you ingrates thought that was bad,” Emmerich cackles from behind the camera, “you ain’t seen nothing yet.”

Every generation thinks that things were better in their day, but — if alien invasion movies have taught us anything — it’s that some warning signs shouldn’t be ignored. When considered in respect to the original, “Independence Day: Resurgence” is an immaculate case study in how far blockbusters have fallen. Where “Independence Day” had a wide cast of charismatic actors, “Resurgence” plugs in their Costco brand generic counterparts. Where “Independence Day” exhibited the patience of classic studio filmmaking, crescendoing to the alien attack by wracking up the tension for more than an hour, “Resurgence” scrambles for its money shots as though it’s afraid that audiences might click away to something more interesting. Where “Independence Day” was written with the gusto of a game-changer and the scale of an extinction-level event, “Resurgence” unfolds with the cynical grace of a cash-grab and the stakes of a shareholders meeting.

The first movie showed the world something it had never seen before; this sequel shows the world something we hope to never see again. As satellite technician David Levinson (Jeff Goldblum, bless his heart) ominously intones before the aliens drop Singapore onto London: “What goes up must come down.”

Except, that’s not true, because one of the first things we learn in the movie (via the blunt force trauma of embarrassingly transparent exposition) is that gravity no longer applies in a world graced with alien technology. When the slimy invaders retreated back into space after the events of the previous film, they left behind the tools required for humans to rebuild their planet and create a defense base on the moon. But that knowledge has come at a cost: Those who survived close encounters with the extraterrestrials are plagued by the same terrifying nightmare, and all of their children have matured into adults with no discernible personalities whatsoever (that’s an observation, not a plot point).

While President Whitmore (Bill Pullman, delegating 95% of his performance to his beard) obsessively draws a symbol that looks like the power button of a laptop, his grown daughter Patricia (“It Follows” star Maika Monroe, controversially replacing Mae Whitman) stands behind him and looks conventionally attractive. We’re told that fight pilot Steven Hiller (Will Smith) died in a training mission between films (sure, why not), but don’t worry because his step-son, Dylan — a child in the first film, now an adult played by Jessie T. Usher — has replaced him in the cockpit.

Independence Day sequel
“Independence Day: Resurgence”

A quick note about Dylan Hiller: In a movie featuring spaceships the size of the Atlantic Ocean, his truly staggering dullness might be the most unrealistic detail — the character displays less charm over the course of these two hours than Will Smith’s actual son packs into his average tweet. Say what you will about Big Willie’s recent career moves, but his absence leaves this movie with a cratering hole of charisma. Big movies need big personalities to power them, and watching Usher and Hemsworth try to carry a large chunk of this studio tentpole is like watching someone try to fuel a race car with two AA batteries. There’s been a lot of talk about how brands are the new celebrities, but “Resurgence” is gallingly dull proof that the star system was a galaxy worth saving.

We never learn who begat renegade pilot Jake Morrison (Liam Hemsworth), but we can only assume that his parents were an Abercrombie catalogue and an errant piece of plywood that Emmerich found on set.

Anyway, some ominous crap happens, all of which suggests that the two decades between the two “Independence Day” movies was a lot more interesting than what happens in this misbegotten sequel (there’s a strong “District 9” vibe to how human civilization — and one African tribe in particular — has engaged with the aliens who were left stranded on our planet, but the film brushes right over it). And then, 20 years to the day since the first wave arrived (what are the odds!), the invaders return with a vengeance.

When the carnage starts, it feels like the work of a guy who has destroyed the world so many times that he’s completely lost sight of how insane it would be to watch the apocalypse firsthand. Never in the history of cinema has global annihilation ever felt so weightless and routine — one established character dies in the background of a wide-shot during the first act, but Emmerich cuts away with such a hilariously pronounced degree of indifference that the moment bypasses “cold” and moves straight on to “rude.” Special effects have emptied filmmakers of their empathy, so inured to leveling Earth’s cities that they’ve forgotten what carnage really feels like. Dr. Manhattan may have evolved into a God, but he sure would have been a terrible director.

Only in its craziest, chintziest moments does “Resurgence” recapture the B-movie spark that made the original so much fun. Without spoiling the story’s only unpredictable digressions (this subplot is hatched very early on), it can be said that humans are confronted with a second extraterrestrial force in this film. And it. Is. Hilarious. A mysterious space MacGuffin that feels as though it was beamed directly from an episode of “Mystery Science Theater 3000,” this nameless white sphere exists for no other reason than to map a broader Independence Day Cinematic Universe.

But the corporate transparency of its purpose is completely eclipsed by the goofiness of its role in the plot, and the breathtakingly stupid dialogue it inspires. It’s also worth noting that the fate of the (newly rebuilt White House) results in a sight gag that’s worthy of Pixar. Twenty years and $200 million in the making, and that’s what we’re left with.

That, and a valuable lesson that you can read between the lines: Nostalgia is a powerful thing, but just because you ache for the past doesn’t mean that the present isn’t significantly worse.

Grade: D-
“Independence Day: Resurgence” is now playing in theaters across this doomed planet.



source: indiewire

Wednesday, June 15, 2016

Box-Office Preview: 'Finding Dory' Set to Swim Past $100M in U.S. Bow


'Finding Dory' Set to Swim Past $100M in U.S. Bow.

'Finding Dory' ,Box office review
Finding Dory Snap.


More than two decades after Finding Nemo won over audiences around the globe, Pixar and Disney's sequel Finding Dory swims into theaters this weekend with high hopes of energizing the summer box office.

If prerelease tracking is right, the sequel could debut to as much as $120 million in North America, marking an all-time best for Pixar in topping the $110.3 million debut of Toy Story 3 in summer 2010, not accounting for inflation.

To date, DreamWorks Animation's Shrek the Third (2007) holds the crown for the top animated opening of all time with $121.6 million, followed by Illumination Entertainment's Minions (2015) with $115.7 million.

Finding Nemo director Andrew Stanton returned to helm Finding Dory alongside co-director Angus MacLane. Ellen DeGeneres also returned to voice the title role of Dory alongside Finding Nemo's Albert Brooks. This time out, Hayden Rolence voices the character Nemo.
The sequel is set six months after the events of the first pic, and focuses on Dory's attempts to reunite with her family even as she battles an endless cycle of amnesia. Accompanied by Nemo and Marlin (Brooks), Dory arrives at the Monterey Marine Life Institute, where she engages with new friends, including a white beluga whale named Destiny (Ty Burrell), a white shark (Kaitlin Olson) and a cranky octopus (Ed O'Neill).

Idris Elba, Diane Keaton, Dominic West, Kate McKinnon, Bill Hader and Sigourney Weaver round out the voice cast.

The weekend's other new offering, Central Intelligence, teams Dwayne Johnson and Kevin Hart for the first time on the big screen. Tracking shows the action-comedy opening in the $30 million range, in line with last summer's Spy, the action-comedy starring Melissa McCarthy, Jason Statham and Jude Law.

Warner Bros. and Universal teamed on Central Intelligence, which cost roughly $40 million to produce. Box-office analysts say they wouldn't be surprised if the film comes in ahead of expectations, considering the popularity of its two leading stars.

In the pic, directed by Rawson Marshall Thurber, Johnson plays a CIA agent and one-time teenage geek returning home for his high-school reunion, where he enlists the aid of a former classmate (Hart) and most popular guy in high school who is now a boring accountant. Amy Ryan and Aaron Paul co-star.



source: .hollywoodreporter

Sunday, June 12, 2016

‘The Conjuring 2′ Is No. 1 at the Box Office This Weekend


‘The Conjuring 2′ Is No. 1 at the Box Office This Weekend

The horror sequel, about a pair of paranormal-activity investigators, grossed $40 million

From left: Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga in 'The Conjuring 2'
From left: Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga in 'The Conjuring 2' PHOTO: NEW LINE CINEMA/COURTESY EVERETT /EVERETT COLLECTION


“The Conjuring 2,” the horror sequel about a pair of paranormal-activity investigators, grossed an impressive $40 million in first place — on par with the 2013 debut of the original film. The original “Conjuring” ended up grossing $137 million, and its sequel appears likely to break the string of disappointing sequels from Hollywood this summer that has included “Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Out of the Shadows” and “Alice Through the Looking Glass.”

“Warcraft,” based on the hugely popular video game series, disappointed in second place with $24.4 million — a paltry showing for a movie that cost about $160 million to make. But the movie has been setting records in China, where it grossed more than $90 million in its first two days of release.

“Now You See Me 2,” starring Jesse Eisenberg and Lizzy Caplan as members of a group of conniving magicians, followed in third place with $23 million. That’s down about $6 million from the original film’s debut.

The first “Now You See Me” kept pulling in audiences in the weeks after its release and eventually hit a domestic gross of $117.7 million; whether the sequel can do the same will be determined in the weeks to come.

Though none of the new releases is a hit with critics, moviegoers seemed to like them. Opening-weekend audiences gave “The Conjuring 2″ and “Now You See Me 2″ each an “A-” grade, according to the CinemaScore market-research firm. “Warcraft” received a “B+.”


source: http://blogs.wsj.com

Friday, June 10, 2016

Warcraft


Warcraft Is Ridiculous, But Paula Patton Is Not

character warcraft universal pictures
Warcraft

The true horror of this film is that it features a roster of actors who shouldn’t have to resort to this sort of thing

Despite what you may have heard, Warcraft—a movie based on the staggeringly popular series of video games—is neither the worst movie ever made nor the greatest. Its director, Duncan Jones (Moon, Source Code), actually knows what he’s doing, and the story hangs together surprisingly well, considering that the movie’s official synopsis opens with “The peaceful realm of Azeroth stands on the brink of war as its civilization faces a fearsome race of invaders” and ends with “From opposing sides, two heroes are set on a collision course that will decide the fate of their family, their people, and their home.” You try making a movie out of that while keeping a straight face.
Still, there are a few things in Warcraft to enjoy, at least in a pointing-and-grunting sort of way: Women characters flounce around in abbreviated animal-skin outfits almost glammed up enough to look at home Roxy Music album cover. The Azerothians, if that’s what you call them, strut around in silly but not-wholly unattractive medieval-faire garb, while the heavily CGI-enhanced Orcs—those would be the invaders, the most memorable of whom is Toby Kebbell, as the principled warrior Durotan—are bulked-up in a repulsively fascinating way. They stomp around on their heavy, beefy feet, looking perpetually a bit forlorn and perplexed, thanks to the specific dental characteristic they all share: underbite fangs.
Still, the Orcs aren’t a wholly uncivilized people. Their big problem is that they’ve come under the rule of a despot, which is why they’re on the rampage in the first place. Left to their own devices, they have some intricate societal rules, and they’re affectionate toward their children. That doesn’t mean there isn’t room for improvement: They show a fondness for over-accessorizing that would make even Iris Apfel blanch. Fave style accents include multiple facial piercings, necklaces made of bones and animal teeth, and hippie braids threaded through beads. Apparently, they’ve never heard of Coco Chanel’s apocryphal style rule: “Look in the mirror before you leave the house and remove one accessory.” Or even just: “Elegance is refusal.”
Anyway, that kind of visual insanity—plus a few crazy battle sequences—are the things that make Warcraft almost worth watching, if you still find yourself at loose ends after you’ve given the dog a bath, organized 10 years’ worth of tax returns and completely moth-proofed your closet. The true horror of Warcraft is that it features a roster of actors who shouldn’t have to resort to this sort of thing. In China, the film made $45 million on its opening day, so anybody who gets a cut of international box office profits will be laughing all the way to the bank. Even so—what is Dominic Cooper, perfectly fine in pictures like The Duchess, An Education and The History Boys, doing shambling about in sub-King Arthur gear? Seeing Ben Foster playing a magickal Merlyn-Gandalf hybrid (who isn’t even, by the way, enough of either) is dispiriting. The Ethiopian-born actress Ruth Negga plays a regal queen here, and she escapes with her dignity intact. Negga is so superb in Jeff Nichols’ Civil Rights drama Loving, to be released later this year, that she may just win an Oscar—unscathed, she will leave Warcraft behind her.
But Paula Patton, as a half-human, half-Orc warrior woman Garona, deserves so much better. Patton has one of the biggest roles in Warcraft, and is, hands down, the chief reason to bother with it—she gives a real performance, dusted with subtleties that are pretty much wasted in this otherwise big, dumb, Jethro Bodine-scaled spectacle. Patton has been terrific in some underappreciated pictures, like the 2008 Outkast musical Idlewild (a modern classic that will someday get its due), and she’s given sturdy, appealing performances in movies like Brad Bird’s Mission: Impossible—Ghost Protocol and Tony Scott’s Déjà Vu. In Warcraft, she can barely deliver her lines—her prosthetic underfangs keep jabbing at her upper lip, giving her a slight lisp. By the end of Warcraft, she’s the only character who makes you wonder: What will she do next? For this, she deserves combat pay.


source: Time

Thursday, June 9, 2016

'Conjuring 2' is a demonic delight


Review: 'Conjuring 2' is a demonic delight

Vera Farmiga stars as Lorraine Warren in 'The Conjuring 2
Vera Farmiga stars as Lorraine Warren in 'The Conjuring 2

When there’s something strange in your neighborhood, who ya gonna call? Ed and Lorraine Warren, obviously.

Played again by Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga, the real-life 1970s ghostbusters head to the British Isles in the horror sequel The Conjuring 2 (*** out of four; rated R; in theaters Friday). And after a trip to the action-film genre with Furious 7, director James Wan returns to the franchise with a freakier follow-up featuring creepy kids, villains who’ll keep you up at night and camerawork that puts moviegoers in a state of impending dread.

The opening sequence revisits the infamous Amityville haunting in 1976, and after Lorraine encounters a demonic nun during a séance, she proclaims, “This is the closest to hell as I ever want to get.” Well, it gets worse for her and her spouse — a year later, and with Lorraine wanting to pull back from their paranormal activity, they’re called to London to investigate why young 11-year-old Janet Hodgson (Madison Wolfe) suddenly has the voice of a 72-year-old dead guy.

Wan ingeniously utilizes snippets of the children’s ditty This Old Man in the background as struggling single mom Peggy Hodgson (Frances O’Connor) and her young brood are driven mad by beds violently shaking at night, weird shadows coming from the pop-heartthrob posters of yesteryear (one of the girls really digs David Soul), toy fire trucks randomly rolling down the hallway and the beat-up chair that seems to have a mind of its own.

A good bit of dark humor is mined for laughs in these moments, and Wan infuses some sweetness to break up the mood as well. There are some overly hokey elements — Wilson strapping on a guitar to sing Elvis to some English children almost makes it seem like you’re watching Blue Hawaii instead of a Conjuring movie. And at two-plus hours, some of those lighter moments derail the tautness of the storytelling.

Wolfe gives a great and eerie performance as the haunted kid who's either possessed or pulling a hoax. It’s hard not to think of Linda Blair in The Exorcist when it comes to these kinds of roles, but Wolfe does the pea-soup brigade proud.

While Wilson is solid as the good-hearted Ed, Farmiga is Wan’s true standout — her Lorraine really gets put through the wringer as she deals with the constant presence of a terrifying supernatural force, and Farmiga sells every gasp.

Like other masters of horror, your Stephen Kings and John Carpenters, Wan wisely utilizes beloved things and turns them against his players. The aforementioned ghastly nun and a room full of crucifixes turning upside down attack characters’ faith and offer a visceral depiction of good vs. evil.

Also, similar to what he did with the doll Annabelle in 2013's first Conjuring (and the toy's 2014 spinoff movie), the filmmaker introduces an innocent-looking zoetrope, which then spawns the Crooked Man. If that sinister sister doesn’t give you the heebie-jeebies, this wicked stringbean with a ghoulish maw of sharp chompers will.

Wan leans into the real history of the 1977 Enfield poltergeist legend, too, though it’s not like he needs any extra inspiration for his fright fest — when it comes to horror, the man pulls no punches or screams.

source: usatoday

Saturday, June 4, 2016

Friday Box Office: 'X-Men: Apocalypse'





Friday Box Office: 'X-Men: Apocalypse' Drops 75%, Tops $100M As 'Alice' Plunges 67%

X-Men: Apocalypse’ image courtesy of 20th Century Fox
X-Men: Apocalypse’ image courtesy of 20th Century Fox

X-Men: Apocalypse earned just $6.55 million on its second Friday, down a harsh 75.1% from its opening $26.4m Friday (which included $8.2m in Thursday previews). Yes, we are at the point when films commonly earn more on their Thursday previews than they do on their eighth day of release. But a 75% drop isn’t remotely a franchise-low for this famously un-leggy series. X-Men: The Last Stand and X-Men: Days of Future Past both opened on Memorial Day and they dropped 77 % ($10.3m) and 73% ($9.4m) on their second Fridays, respectively. And X-Men Origins: Wolverine plunged 75.8% ($8.3m) on its second Friday as well. It also crossed the $100m domestic mark, so there’s that.

More troubling is that it’s close to the same drop with smaller figures overall, and especially disconcerting is that it’s less than the $7.5 million (-64%) second Friday of X-Men: First Class back in 2011 and in 2D. If Apocalypse plays like the last two Memorial Day X-Men movies, it’ll earn around $21-$22 million in weekend two. If it plays like X-Men Origins: Wolverine, it barely gets to $20m on weekend two. So we’re looking at a second-weekend drop of around 66% and a ten-day total of around $117m. It’s still looking like a $156-$167m domestic total.

That’s less than what Deadpool earned in its first week, and may be below the $157 million gross of X-Men and just above the $148m (from 2011 and in 2D) total of X-Men: First Class. but it may be irrelevant if overseas muscle pulls it out of the domestic fire. It will be interesting to see what’s to be done if X-Men basically becomes the comic book superhero franchise equivalent of the Ice Age franchise. That’s not the worst problem to have, but, again… interesting. As for the culprit, it’s less that the film was “rejected” by moviegoers so much that it didn’t make much of a ripple this week. Most of the conversation was about a somewhat grotesque poster/billboard of Jennifer Lawrence being choked by Oscar Isaac (in an otherwise solid campaign), so that’s not exactly a win.

But the other big Memorial Day debut, Alice Through the Looking Glass, has no real hope of rescue. The Walt Disney DIS +0.03% sequel earned $3.155 million yesterday, a 67.5% drop from its opening Friday for a new $43.24m cume. The ill-received (and unrequested) sequel is on is on track to earn $11 million this weekend, a 59% drop from last weekend’s underwhelming $27m Fri-Sun frame. The picture should have a $51m ten-day cume, and it took eight days just to top the $40.8m opening day of Alice in Wonderland. At this rate, the $170m Mia Wasikowska/Johnny Depp/Sasha Baron-Cohen picture will be lucky to top $75m in the states. It’s a real splotch in Disney’s otherwise stellar run, but it’s not one that should be entirely swept under the rug even as they prepare to drown in Finding Dory money.

Sony and Columbia’s The Angry Birds Movie (produced by Rovio, animated by Sony Imageworks) earned $2.6 million on its third Friday of release, a drop of 48% from last Friday. The $73m animated video game adaptation should make around $9.7m on its third weekend (-50%) for an $86m domestic cume. That will put it just past Pokémon: The Movie ($85m) as the third-biggest video game adaptation of all time, just below Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time ($90m). The $131m domestic total of Tomb Raider (back in 2001 and in 2D) may be out of reach. But with around $280m worldwide by the end of tomorrow, it’ll soon pass Resident Evil: Afterlife ($294m) to sit behind only Prince of Persia ($336m) among all video game adaptions. Your move, Warcraft.

source: Forbes

Wednesday, June 1, 2016

The Rock Movies


The Rock Movies: A List Of Upcoming Films Starring Dwayne Johnson

What’s the next step up from "movie star"? Because that’s where we need to classify Dwayne Johnson. The man isn’t just blowing up at the multiplex. He’s capturing the explosion in a headlock, pile-driving it into the ground, cracking a joke as he does so, then finishing us off with his trademark, 1,000-watt mega-smile. If we’re lucky, he’ll even arch an eyebrow, just to remind us that this is The Rock’s world. We’re only renting space for a limited time.

The Rock has at least four movies heading to theaters in the near future. Beyond that, he has attached his name to various projects, all of which sound like they will keep the one-time wrestler and current big-screen phenom in the blockbuster business for years. Because we know that you love The Rock as much as we love The Rock, we’ve documented the actor’s next films… even the ones that have just been announced and are still wading though different forms of development. Which of these are you most interested in seeing? Yes you can answer "all of them" if you so choose.

Central Intelligence

Central Intelligence,Movie
CIA(Johnson)

Let’s start with the movie that we’ll be able to see next month. From the director of We’re the Millers, Central Intelligence casts The Rock and Kevin Hart as former high-school classmates who reunite years later, with one being in the CIA (Johnson) and the other reluctantly helping him crack a difficult case. Not surprisingly, Rock and Hart seem to have incredible chemistry with each other, and the trailers for Central Intelligence had a ton of authentic laughs… many coming from the Rock shower scene that involves some incredible prosthetics (pictured above).

Release date: June 17

Moana


We won’t see The Rock in Disney’s animated Moana, but we’re bound to hear him when the film opens over the Thanksgiving holiday. Set in the ancient South Pacific world of Oceania, Moana will follow a young woman and skilled navigator who sets sail on a thrilling adventure to find a fabled island. Johnson isn’t voicing Moana. Instead, he’ll lend his pipes to Maui, a demi-god who helps Moana on her journey… especially when she starts to encounter sea creatures and legendary oceanic obstacles.

Release date: November 23

Fast 8

Fast 8,Hoobs
Fast 8, Hoobs

You can’t keep a good franchise down, and so – even though they lost one of their founding fathers in Paul Walker – the eighth Fast & Furious film is expected to race into theaters in 2017, with new locations (New York City and Cuba, according to reports) and a new villain in Charlize Theron. Still, the F&F series is about family, and The Rock has been part of the crew since Fast Five (still the highwater mark, in my opinion, of this wildly entertaining series). What will Hobbs be doing in Fast 8? No clue, but we’re willing to bet it will b bloody, brutal and totally badass.

Release date: April 14, 2017

Baywatch

Baywatch the Movie
Baywatch

After pounding bad guys as part of his Fast series, it’s back to the beach for Dwayne Johnson as he heads up a remake of the classic TV show Baywatch. Only, from everything we have been hearing, this one is NOT television friendly. Co-starring Zac Efron, Alexandra Daddario, Priyanka Chopra and several members of the original Baywatch cast, this new comedy is going to be pushing the hard-R rating… which can come from violence (it’s going to have a criminal element to it) but likely will come from the language and humor. So long as it’s funny, and given the Rock’s increasing sense of humor and confidence as an on-screen comedian, we’re feeling optimistic.

Release date: May 19, 2017

Jumanji

Jumanji movie,The Rock
JumanJi

This one, all of a sudden, has been on The Rock’s radar. And it feels like it might be happening sooner rather than later (or later than other projects on this list), because casting news broke fairly recently. Johnson has said that his Central Intelligence co-star Kevin Hart would be part of the remake. And Jack Black recently joined the cast. He Rock has even talked about how they have a great tribute to Robin Williams, the original star of Jumanji, planned, so it seems like this one if further along than we thought.

Release date: July 28, 2017

San Andreas 2

San Andreas 2, The Rock
San Andreas 2

After Baywatch, we start to get speculative, as nothing on The Rock’s calendar has an actual release date… just a lot of chatter, and updates from the actor’s camp on project possibilities. San Andreas 2 is a no-brainer, as the first movie earned a whopping $473 million in global ticket sales. Rumors at the time of announcement had Dwayne Johnson’s character – an LAFD search-and-rescue helicopter pilot – going up against the Ring of Fire… which means The Rock is going to punch a volcano. No release date yet, but seeing as how Rock loves working with Alexandra Daddario, we think this one’s destined to happen.

Doc Savage

The rock movie
Doc Savage

Shane Black returned to theaters recently with his ‘70s detective noir The Nice Guys, and while he was on the publicity circuit, he talked about projects from his past, and his hopeful future. The writer/director has scripts in motion for The Predator, a reboot of that popular franchise, as well as a stab at Doc Savage, a pulp magazine character. Shortly after that news broke, The Rock teased a collaboration with Black that he would film in 2017. It’s likely Doc Savage, as that story would be about a heroic character who’s damn near perfect in every way… sounds exactly like Dwayne Johnson! Look or more news on this one soon.

The Robert Ludlum Universe

The Robert Ludlum Universe
The Robert Ludlum Universe

This one might be the most recent addition to The Rock’s calendar… because the man clearly isn’t satisfied unless he has double-digit projects on his cinematic To-Do list. The late Robert Ludlum wrote thrillers and espionage stories (the Bourne series drew inspiration from Ludlum’s stories), and Dwayne Johnson recently broke the news that he would be backing an adaptation of the author’s The Janson Directive, which would cast The Rock as an ex-Navy SEAL who gets caught up in a far-reaching government conspiracy that has him hunted by assassins from the Consular Operations. Naturally, if this hits, The Rock could have another franchise on his hands. Because the only thing The Rock likes more than kicking ass if having a new franchise to his name.

Journey to the Center of the Earth 3 and 4

Journey to the Center of the Earth 3 and 4, The Rock
Journey to the Center of the Earth 3 and 4

We’re going to combine these last two into one entry, because if they happen, they will be a package deal. Before Dwayne Johnson and his Journey director Brad Peyton turned their attentions to San Andreas, they announced plans to make two more Journey to the Center of the Earth films (meaning, parts 3 and 4). Then again, Journey 2: Mysterious Island came out in 2012, and there hasn’t been much news on new stories since – whereas, as this list proves, The Rock has added 11 other movies to his schedule. These may still happen, but for now, they come with a massive grain of salt.


source: cinema blend